emis_exams_module
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| emis_exams_module [2022/08/22 03:38] – [Candidate Count] ghachey | emis_exams_module [2022/08/22 04:04] (current) – [By benchmarks] ghachey | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| ==== By benchmarks ==== | ==== By benchmarks ==== | ||
| - | From our original example we have three benchmarks. And based on the benchmarks' | + | From our original example we have three benchmarks. And based on the benchmarks' |
| * Benchmark 3.1.1: Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform … [12 ITEMS] with the cut-offs as: | * Benchmark 3.1.1: Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform … [12 ITEMS] with the cut-offs as: | ||
| Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
| - | ===== Indicator Count ===== | + | ===== Analysis Method - Indicator Count ===== |
| Candidate count is the simpler more natural way to analyze the results. However, it is not the only way. The indicator count traditionally used in SOE Assessment does it differently. Instead of counting students performing at each levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams this methods count the indicators performing at the levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams. | Candidate count is the simpler more natural way to analyze the results. However, it is not the only way. The indicator count traditionally used in SOE Assessment does it differently. Instead of counting students performing at each levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams this methods count the indicators performing at the levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams. | ||
emis_exams_module.1661139496.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/22 03:38 by ghachey