emis_exams_module
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
emis_exams_module [2022/08/19 03:09] – [Indicator Count] ghachey | emis_exams_module [2022/08/22 04:04] (current) – [By benchmarks] ghachey | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==== Subject Areas, Standards and Benchmarks ==== | ==== Subject Areas, Standards and Benchmarks ==== | ||
- | Exams (aka. assessments) are typically given at various stages of a student' | + | Exams (aka. assessments) are typically given at various stages of a student' |
* Standard 3.1: Number Sense | * Standard 3.1: Number Sense | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
==== Exam Items ==== | ==== Exam Items ==== | ||
- | To assess students a number of items (questions) make up an exam. This can be anywhere from 40 items to 100 items. There is no hard rule on the number of items but typically it will be a multiple of 4 since the results are usually compiled into 4 levels of achievement discussed in the next section. And since the analysis is possible all the way down to indicators it is usually required to have 4 items minimum to assess a particular indicator. So for the simplified example above the whole test could have 20 items (a small exam). | + | To assess students a number of items (questions) make up an exam. This can be anywhere from 40 items to 72 items, but it could be more or less. There is no hard rule on the number of items but typically it will be a multiple of 4 since the results are usually compiled into 4 levels of achievement discussed in the next section. And since the analysis is possible all the way down to indicators it is usually required to have 4 items minimum to assess a particular indicator. So for the simplified example above the whole test could have 20 items (a small exam). |
* Standard 3.1: Number Sense | * Standard 3.1: Number Sense | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
For simplicity, the levels of achievement will be referred to as simply Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and Level 4 for the remaining of this document. | For simplicity, the levels of achievement will be referred to as simply Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and Level 4 for the remaining of this document. | ||
- | ===== Candidate Count ===== | + | ===== Analysis Method - Candidate Count ===== |
The candidate count analysis can be done at various levels including: | The candidate count analysis can be done at various levels including: | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
==== By benchmarks ==== | ==== By benchmarks ==== | ||
- | From our original example we have three benchmarks. And based on the benchmarks' | + | From our original example we have three benchmarks. And based on the benchmarks' |
* Benchmark 3.1.1: Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform … [12 ITEMS] with the cut-offs as: | * Benchmark 3.1.1: Use place value understanding and properties of operations to perform … [12 ITEMS] with the cut-offs as: | ||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
- | ===== Indicator Count ===== | + | ===== Analysis Method - Indicator Count ===== |
Candidate count is the simpler more natural way to analyze the results. However, it is not the only way. The indicator count traditionally used in SOE Assessment does it differently. Instead of counting students performing at each levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams this methods count the indicators performing at the levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams. | Candidate count is the simpler more natural way to analyze the results. However, it is not the only way. The indicator count traditionally used in SOE Assessment does it differently. Instead of counting students performing at each levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams this methods count the indicators performing at the levels of achievement for benchmarks, standards and whole exams. |
emis_exams_module.1660878570.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/19 03:09 by ghachey